We need to expand our definition of ‘pro-life’
Pro-life bumper stickers make me uncomfortable. So do pro-life T-shirts with their large pictures of unborn babies.
They don’t make me uncomfortable because I’m pro-abortion. I agree with the church’s teachings on the sanctity of life at every stage. I do not believe in the death penalty; don’t believe in euthanasia and rarely think that war is the only answer to an international problem. Rather, my discomfort with some aspects of the pro-life movement in general, and the Catholic piece of it in particular, arises from my perspective as a foster and adoptive parent. I see too little of a connection between the pro-life movement and the foster and adoptive community.
As of December 2008, there were 2,638 children in Milwaukee County who needed placement outside of their homes because of allegations of neglect or abuse against their parents. That year, there were only 857 active, licensed foster homes able to receive those children. The rest of the children had to be placed with unlicensed relatives or in group homes. In Milwaukee, as well as in other cities its size or larger, the families who step forward to foster are too often marginal themselves. Recent tragedies highlighted in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s series on the ills of the Milwaukee foster care system illustrate just how dire the situation is.